XSS locator. Inject this string, and in most
cases where a script is vulnerable with no special XSS vector
requirements the word "XSS" will pop up. Use the URL encoding calculator
below to encode the entire string. Tip: if you're in a rush and need to
quickly check a page, often times injecting the depreciated
"<PLAINTEXT>" tag will be enough to check to see if something is
vulnerable to XSS by messing up the output appreciably:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
XSS locator
2. If you don't have much space and know there is no vulnerable
JavaScript on the page, this string is a nice compact XSS injection
check. View source after injecting it and look for <XSS verses
<XSS to see if it is vulnerable:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
No
filter evasion. This is a normal XSS JavaScript injection, and most
likely to get caught but I suggest trying it first (the quotes are not
required in any modern browser so they are omitted here):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Image XSS
using the JavaScript directive (IE7.0 doesn't support the JavaScript
directive in context of an image, but it does in other contexts, but the
following show the principles that would work in other tags as well -
I'll probably revise this at a later date):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
No
quotes and no semicolon:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Case
insensitive XSS attack vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
HTML
entities (the semicolons are required for this to work):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Grave
accent obfuscation (If you need to use both double and single quotes
you can use a grave accent to encapsulate the JavaScript string - this
is also useful because lots of cross site scripting filters don't know
about grave accents):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Malformed IMG tags. Originally found by
Begeek
(but cleaned up and shortened to work in all browsers), this XSS vector
uses the relaxed rendering engine to create our XSS vector within an IMG
tag that should be encapsulated within quotes. I assume this was
originally meant to correct sloppy coding. This would make it
significantly more difficult to correctly parse apart an HTML tag:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
fromCharCode (if no quotes of any kind are
allowed you can eval() a fromCharCode in JavaScript to create any XSS
vector you need). Click here to build your own
(thanks to Hannes Leopold):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
UTF-8
Unicode encoding (all of the XSS examples that use a javascript:
directive inside of an <IMG tag will not work in Firefox or Netscape
8.1+ in the Gecko rendering engine mode). Use the XSS calculator for more
information:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Long
UTF-8 Unicode encoding without semicolons (this is often effective
in XSS that attempts to look for "&#XX;", since most people don't
know about padding - up to 7 numeric characters total). This is also
useful against people who decode against strings like $tmp_string =~
s/.*\&#(\d+);.*/$1/; which incorrectly assumes a semicolon is
required to terminate a html encoded string (I've seen this in the
wild):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Hex
encoding without semicolons (this is also a viable XSS attack
against the above string $tmp_string =~ s/.*\&#(\d+);.*/$1/; which
assumes that there is a numeric character following the pound symbol -
which is not true with hex HTML characters). Use the XSS calculator for more
information:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Embedded
tab to break up the cross site scripting attack:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Embedded encoded tab to break up
XSS:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Embeded
newline to break up XSS. Some websites claim that any of the chars
09-13 (decimal) will work for this attack. That is incorrect. Only 09
(horizontal tab), 10 (newline) and 13 (carriage return) work. See the ascii chart for more details.
The following four XSS examples illustrate this vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Embedded carriage return to break
up XSS (Note: with the above I am making these strings longer than they
have to be because the zeros could be omitted. Often I've seen filters
that assume the hex and dec encoding has to be two or three characters.
The real rule is 1-7 characters.):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Multiline
Injected JavaScript using ASCII carriage returns (same as above only a
more extreme example of this XSS vector) these are not spaces just one
of the three characters as described above:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Null breaks up
JavaScript directive. Okay, I lied, null chars also work as XSS vectors
but not like above, you need to inject them directly using something
like Burp Proxy or use
%00 in the URL string or if you want to write your own injection tool
you can either use vim (^V^@ will
produce a null) or the following program to generate it into a text
file. Okay, I lied again, older versions of Opera (circa 7.11 on
Windows) were vulnerable to one additional char 173 (the soft hypen
control char). But the null char %00 is much more useful and helped me
bypass certain real world filters with a variation on this example:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Null breaks
up cross site scripting vector. Here is a little known XSS attack vector
using null characters. You can actually break up the HTML itself using
the same nulls as shown above. I've seen this vector bypass some of the
most restrictive XSS filters to date:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Spaces
and meta chars before the JavaScript in images for XSS (this is
useful if the pattern match doesn't take into account spaces in the word
"javascript:" -which is correct since that won't render- and makes the
false assumption that you can't have a space between the quote and the
"javascript:" keyword. The actual reality is you can have any char from
1-32 in decimal):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Non-alpha-non-digit XSS. While I was
reading the Firefox HTML parser I found that it assumes a
non-alpha-non-digit is not valid after an HTML keyword and therefor
considers it to be a whitespace or non-valid token after an HTML tag.
The problem is that some XSS filters assume that the tag they are
looking for is broken up by whitespace. For example "<SCRIPT\s" !=
"<SCRIPT/XSS\s":
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Non-alpha-non-digit part 2 XSS.
yawnmoth brought my attention to this vector, based on the same idea as
above, however, I expanded on it, using my fuzzer. The Gecko rendering
engine allows for any character other than letters, numbers or
encapsulation chars (like quotes, angle brackets, etc...) between the
event handler and the equals sign, making it easier to bypass cross site
scripting blocks. Note that this also applies to the grave accent char
as seen here:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Non-alpha-non-digit part 3 XSS. Yair Amit brought this to my
attention that there is slightly different behavior between the IE and
Gecko rendering engines that allows just a slash between the tag and the
parameter with no spaces. This could be useful if the system does not
allow spaces.
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Extraneous open brackets.
Submitted by Franz Sedlmaier, this XSS vector could defeat certain
detection engines that work by first using matching pairs of open and
close angle brackets and then by doing a comparison of the tag inside,
instead of a more efficient algorythm like Boyer-Moore
that looks for entire string matches of the open angle bracket and
associated tag (post de-obfuscation, of course). The double slash
comments out the ending extraneous bracket to supress a JavaScript
error:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
No
closing script tags. In Firefox and Netscape 8.1 in the Gecko
rendering engine mode you don't actually need the "></SCRIPT>"
portion of this Cross Site Scripting vector. Firefox assumes it's safe
to close the HTML tag and add closing tags for you. How thoughtful!
Unlike the next one, which doesn't effect Firefox, this does not require
any additional HTML below it. You can add quotes if you need to, but
they're not needed generally, although beware, I have no idea what the
HTML will end up looking like once this is injected:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Protocol resolution in script tags.
This particular variant was submitted by Łukasz Pilorz and was based partially
off of Ozh's protocol resolution bypass below. This cross site scripting
example works in IE, Netscape in IE rendering mode and Opera if you add
in a </SCRIPT> tag at the end. However, this is especially useful
where space is an issue, and of course, the shorter your domain, the
better. The ".j" is valid, regardless of the encoding type because the
browser knows it in context of a SCRIPT tag.
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Half open
HTML/JavaScript XSS vector. Unlike Firefox the IE rendering engine
doesn't add extra data to your page, but it does allow the javascript:
directive in images. This is useful as a vector because it doesn't
require a close angle bracket. This assumes there is any HTML tag below
where you are injecting this cross site scripting vector. Even though
there is no close ">" tag the tags below it will close it. A note:
this does mess up the HTML, depending on what HTML is beneath it. It
gets around the
following NIDS regex:
/((\%3D)|(=))[^\n]*((\%3C)|<)[^\n]+((\%3E)|>)/ because it doesn't
require the end ">". As a side note, this was also affective against
a real world XSS filter I came across using an open ended <IFRAME tag
instead of an <IMG tag:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Double
open angle brackets. This is an odd one that Steven Christey brought to my
attention. At first I misclassified this as the same XSS vector as above
but it's surprisingly different. Using an open angle bracket at the end
of the vector instead of a close angle bracket causes different behavior
in Netscape Gecko rendering. Without it, Firefox will work but Netscape
won't:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
XSS with no single quotes or
double quotes or semicolons:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Escaping JavaScript escapes. When the
application is written to output some user information inside of a
JavaScript like the following: <SCRIPT>var
a="$ENV{QUERY_STRING}";</SCRIPT> and you want to inject your own
JavaScript into it but the server side application escapes certain
quotes you can circumvent that by escaping their escape character. When
this is gets injected it will read <SCRIPT>var
a="\\";alert('XSS');//";</SCRIPT> which ends up un-escaping the
double quote and causing the Cross Site Scripting vector to fire. The XSS locator uses this
method.:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
End title
tag. This is a simple XSS vector that closes <TITLE> tags,
which can encapsulate the malicious cross site scripting attack:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
INPUT
image:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
BODY
image:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
BODY tag (I
like this method because it doesn't require using any variants of
"javascript:" or "<SCRIPT..." to accomplish the XSS attack). Dan Crowley additionally noted that
you can put a space before the equals sign ("onload=" != "onload
="):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Event
Handlers that can be used in similar XSS attacks to the one above
(this is the most comprehensive list on the net, at the time of this
writing). Please note I have excluded browser support from this section
because each one may have different results in different browsers.
Thanks to Rene Ledosquet for the
HTML+TIME updates:
IMG Dynsrc:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
IMG
lowsrc:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
BGSOUND:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
&
JavaScript includes (works in Netscape 4.x):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02] [NS4]
LAYER (also only works in Netscape 4.x)
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02] [NS4]
STYLE sheet:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Remote
style sheet (using something as simple as a remote style sheet you
can include your XSS as the style parameter can be redefined using an
embedded expression.) This only works in IE and Netscape 8.1+ in IE
rendering engine mode. Notice that there is nothing on the page to show
that there is included JavaScript. Note: With all of these remote style
sheet examples they use the body tag, so it won't work unless there is
some content on the page other than the vector itself, so you'll need to
add a single letter to the page to make it work if it's an otherwise
blank page:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Remote style sheet part 2 (this
works the same as above, but uses a <STYLE> tag instead of a
<LINK> tag). A slight variation on this vector was used to hack Google
Desktop. As a side note, you can remove the end </STYLE> tag
if there is HTML immediately after the vector to close it. This is
useful if you cannot have either an equals sign or a slash in your cross
site scripting attack, which has come up at least once in the real
world:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Remote style sheet part 3. This
only works in Opera 8.0 (no longer in 9.x) but is fairly tricky.
According to RFC2616
setting a link header is not part of the HTTP1.1 spec, however some
browsers still allow it (like Firefox and Opera). The trick here is that
I am setting a header (which is basically no different than in the HTTP
header saying Link: <http://ha.ckers.org/xss.css>; REL=stylesheet)
and the remote style sheet with my cross site scripting vector is
running the JavaScript, which is not supported in FireFox:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Remote style sheet part 4. This
only works in Gecko rendering engines and works by binding an XUL file
to the parent page. I think the irony here is that Netscape assumes that
Gecko is safer and therefor is vulnerable to this for the vast majority
of sites:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Local htc
file. This is a little different than the above two cross site
scripting vectors because it uses an .htc file which must be on the same
server as the XSS vector. The example file works by pulling in the
JavaScript and running it as part of the style attribute:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
List-style-image. Fairly esoteric issue
dealing with embedding images for bulleted lists. This will only work in
the IE rendering engine because of the JavaScript directive. Not a
particularly useful cross site scripting vector:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
VBscript in
an image:
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02]
Mocha (older
versions of Netscape only):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02] [NS4]
Livescript (older versions of Netscape
only):
Browser support: [IE7.0|IE6.0|NS8.1-IE] [NS8.1-G|FF2.0] [O9.02] [NS4]
US-ASCII encoding (found by Kurt Huwig). This uses malformed ASCII
encoding with 7 bits instead of 8. This XSS may bypass many content
filters but only works if the host transmits in US-ASCII encoding, or if
you set the encoding yourself. This is more useful against web
application firewall cross site scripting evasion than it is server side
filter evasion. Apache Tomcat is the only known server that transmits in
US-ASCII encoding. I highly suggest anyone interested in alternate
encoding issues look at my
charsets issues page: